Teacher and Student Interaction in English Language Classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0260304021Keywords:
teacher–student interaction, English language teaching, classroom discourse, learner engagement, corrective feedback, ; peer interaction, classroom interactional competenceAbstract
Teacher and student interaction shapes opportunities to use English, negotiate understanding, and respond to feedback. However, visible participation alone provides an incomplete account of its educational value. This article examines how interaction can support language learning through a selective narrative review of research on instructed second language acquisition, classroom discourse, learner engagement, and online teaching. It distinguishes interaction, participation, engagement, and learning, and uses these distinctions to analyse questioning, teacher follow-up, corrective feedback, peer collaboration, and inclusive participation. The synthesis suggests that productive exchanges depend on how teachers respond to learner contributions, how tasks create a need to communicate, and whether students can influence the developing discussion. A proposed sixty-minute lesson illustrates how these principles can inform classroom planning without treating the illustration as empirical evidence. The article also presents a practical approach to reviewing interaction through brief classroom records, learner perspectives, and subsequent language use. It argues for context-sensitive decisions about teacher guidance and learner agency, with particular attention to quieter learners, multilingual resources, and the limits of participation counts as evidence of learning.
References
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students' social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 922–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643689
Hall, J. K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000107
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004027
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563
Moorhouse, B. L., Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2023). E-classroom interactional competencies: Mediating and assisting language learning during synchronous online lessons. RELC Journal, 54(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220985274
Moorhouse, B. L., Walsh, S., Li, Y., & Wong, L. L. C. (2022). Assisting and mediating interaction during synchronous online language lessons: Teachers' professional practices. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 934–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3144
Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What's the use of “triadic dialogue”?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.376
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
Sato, M. (2017). Interaction mindsets, interactional behaviors, and L2 development: An affective-social-cognitive model. Language Learning, 67(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12214
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2019). Do teachers care about research? The research–pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, 73(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy048
Sert, O. (2024). “It helped me grow and develop”: Video-enhanced reflection and feedback in a Swedish teacher education context. TESOL Journal, 15(3), Article e771. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.771
Sert, O., Gynne, A., & Larsson, M. (2025). Developing student-teachers' interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: A discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 16(2), 142–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2024.2337184
Şimşek, G., & Çapar, M. (2022). ELT classroom interaction in Turkey: A systematic review. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 6(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.994908
Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168802lr095oa
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826
Yao, C., & Shao, S. (2024). Factors affecting teacher-student interactions in a foreign language teaching class: A language socialisation theory perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1358. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03900-x
Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners' willingness to communicate. System, 42, 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal publishes all articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright of their work. Anyone may freely share, copy, distribute, adapt, and build upon the published material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/