Semantic Features of Neologisms in Contemporary English: Word Formation, Meaning Change, and Digital Communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0260304020Keywords:
neologisms, English lexicon, word formation, semantic change, digital communication, lexical innovationAbstract
Neologisms provide evidence of the ways in which language responds to technological innovation, social change, and emerging communicative needs. This article examines selected examples of contemporary English neologisms, focusing on their word-formation patterns, semantic development, and contextual functions in digital communication. Drawing on a qualitative descriptive approach, it considers compounds and blends, affixation, conversion, abbreviations, and semantic innovation. Examples such as doomscrolling, ghosting, brunch, cloud, viral, and unfriend illustrate the relationship between linguistic form, newly emerging concepts, and context-dependent meaning. The analysis distinguishes newly created forms from established words that have acquired new meanings, and it emphasizes that a word's status as a neologism cannot be established solely from its current popularity or technological association. The article proposes a contextual analytical sequence that considers (1) the form and formation process of a lexical item, (2) its semantic contribution, and (3) the communicative context in which it is used. The discussion highlights the role of digital platforms in circulating lexical innovations while acknowledging that wider claims about frequency, permanence, or social acceptance require corpus-based and diachronic evidence. The study contributes a practical framework for examining English neologisms in lexical-semantic research and language education.
References
Alisoy, H. (2026a). Lexical and pragmatic features of the people–elite opposition in English-language political campaigns. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 3(4), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0260304018
Alisoy, H. (2026b). The “Tech-Industrial Complex” and the “Oligarchy” warning: Neologism, intertextuality, and prophetic rhetoric in Biden's 2025 farewell address. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum.
Ashrafova, I. (2023). Phonetic and lexical features of words borrowed from French into English. Web of Semantic: Universal Journal on Innovative Education, 2(11), 11–26.
Ashrafova, I. (2024a). Cross-linguistic influence: Analyzing English loanwords in contemporary French. American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education, 2(4), 381–390. https://www.grnjournal.us/index.php/STEM/article/view/4429
Ashrafova, I. (2024b). The syntactic adaptation of English borrowings in contemporary French. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.69760/90y05b95
Ashrafova, I. (2025). Crossing boundaries: The integration and impact of English loanwords in French media. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500114
Ashrafova, I. A. (2026). İngilis dilində yeni yaranan sözlər və onların semantik xüsusiyyətləri [Newly emerging words in English and their semantic features] [Unpublished research work]. Nakhchivan State University.
Babayev, C. (2022). Məna təsvirində üslub vasitələri və dil komponentlərinin rolu [The role of stylistic devices and language components in meaning description]. Elmi Əsərlər, Nakhchivan State University, 17–20.
Babayev, C. (2025). Amerika dialektlərinin dil xüsusiyyətləri [Linguistic features of American dialects]. Naxçıvan Dövlət Universitetinin Elmi Əsərləri, 130(1), 32–40.
Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge University Press.
Blank, A. (1999). Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In A. Blank & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 61–90). De Gruyter.
Booij, G. (2012). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Durkin, P. (Ed.). (2016). The Oxford handbook of lexicography. Oxford University Press.
Ibrahim, U. Z. (2020). The ways of appearance and formation of neologisms in the modern French periodicals. Elmi Xəbərlər, Western Caspian University, (2), 134.
Ismayilli, T. (2021). The role of gestures and mimics in conveying affirmation concept. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 7(4), 357–363.
Lieber, R. (2016). Introducing morphology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mammadova, I. (2024). Motivational and practical frameworks for teaching English to weak learners: An empirical study. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 1(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.024050
Mammadova, I. (2025). Cognitive and pedagogical dimensions of translation: A theoretical and practical exploration. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500127
Mattiello, E. (2008). An introduction to English slang: A description of its morphology, semantics and sociology. Polimetrica.
Nağıyeva, G. (2024). Choosing the right methods during the formation of speaking skills. Euro-Global Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, (2), 58–64.
Nuri, A. (2022). İngilis dilinin tədrisində sosial mediadan istifadə [Using social media in English language teaching]. Filologiya Məsələləri, (2), 146–151.
Nuri, A. (2023a). İngilis dilində məhsuldar söz yaradıcılığı [Productive word formation in English]. Filologiya Məsələləri, (9), 165–173.
Nuri, A. (2023b). Language in the digital era: Navigating informal and formal registers in English. International Journal of Philosophical Studies and Social Sciences, 7(3), 24–29.
Plag, I. (2018). Word-formation in English (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge University Press.
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. Continuum.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal publishes all articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright of their work. Anyone may freely share, copy, distribute, adapt, and build upon the published material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/