Diachronic Analysis of Case Category in English Nouns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0260304008Keywords:
diachronic linguistics, English nouns, grammatical case, Old English, Middle English, Modern English, declension, morphological change, historical grammarAbstract
The case category of English nouns has undergone substantial structural and functional changes throughout the historical development of the English language. From the relatively rich inflectional system of Old English to the reduced morphology of Middle English and the predominantly analytical structure of Modern English, the expression of grammatical relations has shifted from morphological marking to syntactic position, prepositions, and possessive constructions. This article examines the diachronic development of the case category in English nouns, focusing on the principal characteristics of Old English, Middle English, and Modern English. Particular attention is paid to the declensional patterns of nouns, the functions of the nominative, accusative, genitive, and dative cases, and the historical processes responsible for the gradual reduction of nominal inflections. The study employs descriptive, comparative-historical, and structural analyses to identify the major tendencies in the evolution of English nominal morphology. It demonstrates that the loss of case endings was not simply a morphological simplification but a broader grammatical reorganization that increased the importance of word order and analytical constructions. Although the traditional four-case system of Old English disappeared from the nominal paradigm, certain functions of the genitive survived in the Modern English possessive, while other grammatical relationships came to be expressed through prepositions and syntactic constructions. The historical development of English nominal case therefore illustrates the transition from a predominantly synthetic grammatical structure to a more analytical one.
References
Allen, C. L. (1995). Case marking and reanalysis: Grammatical relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford University Press.
Allen, C. L. (2005). Changes in case marking in NP: From Old English to Middle English. In M. Butt & T. H. King (Eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case (pp. 223–249). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044651-6/50011-2
Allen, C. L. (2008). Genitives in early English: Typology and evidence. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216680.001.0001
Baugh, A. C., & Cable, T. (2013). A history of the English language (6th ed.). Routledge.
Blake, N. F. (1992). A history of the English language. Macmillan.
Fischer, O., van Kemenade, A., Koopman, W., & van der Wurff, W. (2000). The syntax of early English. Cambridge University Press.
Hogg, R. M., & Fulk, R. D. (2011). A grammar of Old English: Vol. 2. Morphology. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444327472
Kolasińska, P. (2013). Early Old English nominal system: Synchronic declensions in the Vespasian Psalter. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 48(4), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2013-0013
Lass, R. (1992). Phonology and morphology. In N. F. Blake (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language: Vol. 2. 1066–1476 (pp. 23–155). Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, B., & Robinson, F. C. (2012). A guide to Old English (8th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Quirk, R., & Wrenn, C. L. (1957). An Old English grammar (2nd ed.). Methuen.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
Rosenbach, A. (2002). Genitive variation in English: Conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899818
Sweet, H. (1892). A new English grammar, logical and historical. Part I: Introduction, phonology, and accidence. Clarendon Press.
Traugott, E. C. (1992). Syntax. In R. M. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language: Vol. 1. The beginnings to 1066 (pp. 168–289). Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal publishes all articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright of their work. Anyone may freely share, copy, distribute, adapt, and build upon the published material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/