The Construction of Ideological Meaning in Discourse: Lexical, Semantic, and Pragmatic Means
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0260304004Keywords:
critical discourse analysis, social actors, metaphor, modality, pragmatics, semantic polarizationAbstract
This article examines the role of lexical, semantic, and pragmatic means in the construction of ideological meaning in political, media, and literary discourse. The study is based on a purposive qualitative corpus consisting of eight political speeches, six media texts covering the 2020 protests following the death of George Floyd, and seven literary works. The analysis addresses the representation of social actors, evaluative lexis, metaphor, modality, presupposition, implicature, and semantic polarization. The theoretical framework combines critical discourse analysis, Appraisal theory, conceptual metaphor, systemic-functional grammar, and pragmatics. The findings show that ideological meaning is not a fixed property of individual linguistic units but may be formed through their interaction within textual and social context. Media texts more prominently display varied forms of nomination of social actors, political speeches foreground collective identity and commitment, and literary discourse emphasizes evaluation and semantic contrast. The study demonstrates that the function of linguistic choices is determined by their use in specific communicative and social conditions. The comparison rests not on statistical frequencies but on the functional interpretation of selected examples. The limited and heterogeneous corpus does not allow the findings to be generalized to broader discourse domains.
References
Atwood, M. (1985). The handmaid’s tale. McClelland and Stewart.
Betz, B. (2020, May 31). George Floyd unrest: Riots, fires, violence escalate in several major cities. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/us/george-floyd-cities-brace-riots-national-guard-troops-mobilize
Bush, G. W. (2001, February 27). Address before a joint session of the Congress on administration goals. The American Presidency Project. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-before-joint-session-the-congress-administration-goals
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Churchill, W. (1940, June 4). We shall fight on the beaches [Speech]. International Churchill Society. https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/speeches/1940-the-finest-hour/we-shall-fight-on-the-beaches/
Cohen, L. (2020, May 30). Portland becomes first city to declare protest over George Floyd’s death a “riot.” CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/portland-becomes-first-city-to-declare-protest-over-george-floyds-death-a-riot/
Demonstrators, police clash across nation in another night of protest. (2020, May 31). The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/05/30/george-floyd-protests-live-updates/
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Golding, W. (1954). Lord of the flies. Faber and Faber.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hennessy-Fiske, M. (2020, May 30). In Minneapolis, center stage for a nation’s turmoil and rage, criticism emerges. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-05-30/minnesota-protesters-fault-police-crackdown
Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. Chatto & Windus.
Kennedy, J. F. (1961, January 20). Inaugural address. National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-john-f-kennedys-inaugural-address
King, M. L., Jr. (1963, August 28). I have a dream: Address at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute. https://okra.stanford.edu/link/document630828-044
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lee, H. (1960). To kill a mockingbird. J. B. Lippincott & Co.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Miles, F. (2020, June 3). George Floyd: Protesters use low-tech methods to try maintaining the peace. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/us/george-floyd-protesters-use-low-tech-methods-to-try-maintaining-the-peace
Mogelson, L. (2020, May 31). In Minneapolis, protesters confront the police—and one another. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/us-journal/in-minneapolis-protesters-confront-the-police-and-one-another-george-floyd
Nixon, R. (1971, June 17). Remarks about an intensified program for drug abuse prevention and control. The American Presidency Project. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-about-intensified-program-for-drug-abuse-prevention-and-control
Obama, B. (2004, July 27). Keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. The American Presidency Project. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/keynote-address-the-2004-democratic-national-convention
Orwell, G. (1945). Animal farm. Secker & Warburg.
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. Secker & Warburg.
Shakespeare, W. (n.d.). Julius Caesar. Folger Shakespeare Library. https://www.folger.edu/explore/shakespeares-works/julius-caesar/read/
Trump, D. J. (2015, June 16). Remarks announcing candidacy for president in New York City. The American Presidency Project. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-announcing-candidacy-for-president-new-york-city
Trump, D. J. (2017, January 20). Inaugural address. The American Presidency Project. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/inaugural-address-14
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal publishes all articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright of their work. Anyone may freely share, copy, distribute, adapt, and build upon the published material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
