The Role of Communication in the Formation of Discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0260304001

Keywords:

discourse, communication, communicative functions, context, participant roles, text analysis

Abstract

This article examines the role of communication in the formation of discourse, focusing on the relationships among linguistic form, communicative purpose, context, and participant roles. It adopts a descriptive conceptual approach, drawing on foundational scholarship and recent studies of interaction and digital discourse and using constructed examples to clarify distinctions rather than report empirical findings. The discussion addresses three questions: how discourse differs from its textual record, how communicative functions operate within discourse, and how addressee relationships shape spoken, written, and literary communication. The analysis proposes that discourse is best understood as situated meaning-making rather than as either an isolated text or the simple transmission of information. Informative, regulatory, expressive, and phatic functions are treated as overlapping analytical categories, while monologue and dialogue are distinguished by their organization of participation rather than by the presence or absence of communication. Particular attention is given to the difference between an addressee and a person mentioned in an utterance, and to the layered audiences of literary discourse. The article concludes that communication provides an organizing basis for discourse analysis when linguistic choices are examined alongside purpose, audience, medium, and context. Its contribution is a compact conceptual framework for interpreting these relationships, with the limitations of a non-empirical study explicitly acknowledged.

Author Biography

  • Elnaz Aliyeva, Nakhchivan State University, Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan

    Elnaz Aliyeva

    Doctor of Philosophy in Philology, Department of English Language and Translation, Nakhchivan State University, Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan

    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-4748

References

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà, Eds.; 2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

Harris, Z. S. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/409987

Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.

Kendrick, K. H., Brown, P., Dingemanse, M., Floyd, S., Gipper, S., Hayano, K., Hoey, E., Hoymann, G., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Levinson, S. C. (2020). Sequence organization: A universal infrastructure for social action. Journal of Pragmatics, 168, 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.009

Mammadov, A. (2018). Studies in text and discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Ogiermann, E., & Bella, S. (2021). On the dual role of expressive speech acts: Relational work on signs announcing closures during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Pragmatics, 184, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.020

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Seuren, L. M., Wherton, J., Greenhalgh, T., & Shaw, S. E. (2021). Whose turn is it anyway? Latency and the organization of turn-taking in video-mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 172, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.005

Tanskanen, S.-K. (2021). Fragmented but coherent: Lexical cohesion on a YouTube channel. Discourse, Context & Media, 44, Article 100548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100548

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499

Virtanen, M. T., Vepsäläinen, H., & Koivisto, A. (2021). Managing several simultaneous lines of talk in Finnish multi-party mobile messaging. Discourse, Context & Media, 39, Article 100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100460

Downloads

Published

2026-10-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Aliyeva, E. (2026). The Role of Communication in the Formation of Discourse. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities , 3(4), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0260304001