Conservative–Liberal Polarization in the United States: Approaches to Reducing Tensions Between Culture and Politics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0250206010

Keywords:

Liberal pole, conservative pole, political tension, ideological polarization

Abstract

This article examines the growing cultural and political tensions between conservative and liberal ideologies in the United States and analyzes the key factors contributing to this polarization. The study demonstrates that these conflicts extend beyond ideological differences alone; media discourse, polarization in social networks, and dominant narratives within the education and cultural sectors further intensify societal divisions. Conservatives often perceive their values as being underrepresented in the public sphere, whereas liberals advocate for a more inclusive and evolving model of society.

One of the principal findings of the study is that the absolutization of ideological positions on both sides limits opportunities for dialogue and weakens social cohesion. In order to reduce polarization, the article emphasizes the importance of strengthening mutual dialogue, minimizing the polarizing influence of the media, ensuring balanced representation of diverse ideological perspectives, and fostering a culture of open debate within educational institutions. The study highlights the multi-level nature of political polarization and argues that it emerges from the parallel interaction of psychological, social, and cultural mechanisms rather than from a single explanatory factor.

Author Biography

  • Ramiz Tarverdiyev, Master’s Student, Department of International Relations and Diplomacy, Azerbaijan

    Tarverdiyev, R. Master’s Student, Department of International Relations and Diplomacy, Azerbaijan. Email: ramiz.tarverdiyev@icloud.com. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4206-8809

References

Casey, J. P., Vanman, E. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2025). Empathic conservatives and moralizing liberals: Political intergroup empathy varies by political ideology and is explained by moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(5), 678–700.

https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241234567

de Oliveira Santos, D., & Jost, J. T. (2024). Liberal–conservative asymmetries in anti-democratic tendencies are partly explained by psychological differences in a nationally representative U.S. sample. Communications Psychology, 2(1), Article 61.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00061-x

Jiang, E. Q., & Shih, M. J. (2025). Liberals and conservatives respond divergently to stereotype portrayals of race and gender. Communications Psychology, 3, Article 109.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00287-6

Klein, E. (2020). Why we’re polarized. Simon & Schuster.

Leong, Y. C., Chen, J., Willer, R., & Zaki, J. (2020). Conservative and liberal attitudes drive polarized neural responses to political content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(44), 27731–27739.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008538117

Zhu, X., & Pechmann, C. (2025). Political polarization triggers conservatives’ misinformation spread to attain ingroup dominance. Journal of Marketing, 89(1), 39–55.

https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241234567

Downloads

Published

2025-12-13

How to Cite

Tarverdiyev, R. (2025). Conservative–Liberal Polarization in the United States: Approaches to Reducing Tensions Between Culture and Politics. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities , 2(6), 102-108. https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0250206010

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.