The Procedure for the Enforcement of Court Decisions in Civil Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0250205024Keywords:
court decision, enforcement proceedings, compulsory enforcement, enforcement of court decisionsAbstract
The significance of the examination of cases and the issuance of final judgments by courts is multifaceted and encompasses several key aspects. Courts are among the primary institutions that ensure the supremacy of law. They guarantee the proper application of legislation and the fair resolution of legal disputes. Final judgments provide a legal safeguard for the protection of citizens’ rights and freedoms. Through the rendered court decision, the instability existing within a disputed legal relationship is eliminated, and it acquires certainty, stability, and general binding force in terms of substantive law. This creates a legal opportunity for the unhindered realization of rights or interests protected by law, thereby ensuring the protection of violated or disputed subjective rights.
The purpose of this article is to analyze, in an academic manner, the concept, legal nature, main types, and legal effects of court decisions in civil cases, as well as to develop recommendations for improving the quality of such decisions, taking into account current legal practice and scholarly literature. The article employs a parallel approach to the use of legal norms, legal scholarship, and judicial practice.
References
Afanasyeva, N. A. (2022). Grazhdanskiy protsess v skhemakh i tablitstsakh (uchebnoe posobie). Moskva: Yurayt.
Aliyev, M. Ə. (2021). Execution of court decisions in civil cases within the framework of the right to a fair trial: National legislation and international practice. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, (1), 1.
Azərbaycan Respublikası Ali Məhkəməsinin Bülleteni. (2020). Materials on judicial practice and application of decisions. Bulletin, 2020(2).
Azərbaycan Respublikası Baş Prokurorluğu. (2024). The mandatory nature of enforcement of legally binding court decisions.
Azərbaycan Respublikasının Ədliyyə Nazirliyi. (2025). Enforcement officers and their role: Implementation of court decisions. Retrieved from https://njustice.gov.az/elanlar/icra-memurlari-ve-onlarin-rolu-mehkeme-qerarlarinin-heyata-kecirilmesi
Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan Retrieved from https://e-qanun.az/framework/46945
Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan Retrieved from https://e-qanun.az/framework/897
E-huquq.az. (2025). What steps can be taken against a debtor as a compulsory enforcement measure? Retrieved from https://www.e-huquq.az/az/news/maariflendirme/28024.html
E-qanun. (2002). Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On Enforcement”.
European Court of Human Rights. (1992). Hadjianastassiou v. Greece, App. No. 12945/87, Judgment of 16 December 1992.
European Court of Human Rights. (1992). Hadjianastassiou v. Greece, App. No. 12945/87, Judgment of 16 Dec 1992.
European Court of Human Rights. (1993). Papamichalopoulos v. Greece, App. No. 14556/89, Judgment of 24 June 1993.
European Court of Human Rights. (1993). Papamichalopoulos v. Greece, App. No. 14556/89, Judgment of 24 June 1993.
Gadzhiev, G. A. (2015). Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Moskva: Norma.
Garibli, I. (2024). Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti'ne Bağlı Nahçivan Özerk Cumhuriyeti'nin Hukuki Statüsü. Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 6(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.29329/ated.2024.665.9
Garibli, I. (2024). Legal status of the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, which is an integral part of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Sciences of Europe, (142), 18-21.
Garibli, I. (2024). Legal status of the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, which is an integral part of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Sciences of Europe (Praha, Czech Republic).
Garibli, I. (2024). Reconsideration of Civil Cases in the Courts of the Republic of Azerbaijan under Cassation Procedure. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 1(1), 173-179.
Garibli, I. (2025). Claims in Civil Cases Considered by the Courts. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 2(2), 113-122.
Garibli, I. (2025). The Concept and Historical Development of the Institution of Shared Ownership. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 12(Özel Sayı 2025-1), 46-63.
Garibli, I. (2025). Claims in Civil Cases Considered by the Courts. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 2 (2), 113-122.
Garibli, I. The Concept and Historical Development of the Institution of Shared Ownership.
Garibli, I., & Ozturk, A. (2024). The main features of the consideration of civil cases in the courts of appeal of the Republic of Azerbaijan. BBC, 4(05), 26.
İnsan Hüquqlarına Dair Beynəlxalq Standartların Təsbiti Üzrə Birgə İşçi Qrupu. (2013).
Ivakin, V. N. (2016). Grazhdanskoe protsessualnoe pravo.
Lavryk , O., Biryukova, A., Garibli, I., Bespalko, I., & Karpenko, M. (2025). The role of advocacy in the investigation of crimes against the life and health. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(4), 2026258. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026258
Öztürk, A., & Garibli, I. (2025). The Characteristics of Monarchy as a Form of Government. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(2), 117-125.
Treushnikov, M. K. (2014). Grazhdanskiy protsess: Uchebnik (5th ed.). Moskva: Statut.
Xüsusi icra məmurları haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikasının Qanunu. Retrieved from https://president.az/az/articles/view/69667
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
